From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Nov 19, 1993
627 So. 2d 1133 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993)

Opinion

CR-92-260.

August 13, 1993. Rehearing Denied September 30, 1993. Certiorari Denied November 19, 1993 Alabama Supreme Court 1930049.

Appeal from Morgan Circuit Court; Rudolph Slate, Judge.

Joseph Propst II, Decatur, for appellant.

James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Lisa Gunter, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


ON RETURN TO REMAND


The appellant, Wilburn Scott, was convicted of selling a controlled substance. We remanded this cause with directions to the circuit court to resentence the appellant. Scott v. State, 627 So.2d 1131 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993). The trial court has complied with our directions and has sentenced the appellant to 3 years' imprisonment; that sentence was enhanced by an additional 5 years' imprisonment pursuant to § 13A-12-250, because the sale occurred within three miles of a school, and by another 5 years' imprisonment pursuant to § 13A-12-270, because the sale occurred within three miles of a public housing project. The appellant's sentence, including all enhancements, is 13 years' imprisonment.

The judgment in this cause is now due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.


Summaries of

Scott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Nov 19, 1993
627 So. 2d 1133 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993)
Case details for

Scott v. State

Case Details

Full title:Wilburn SCOTT v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Nov 19, 1993

Citations

627 So. 2d 1133 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Moore v. State

While we affirm the appellant's conviction, we must nevertheless remand this cause to the trial court because…

Lucas v. State

"While we affirm the appellant's conviction, we must nevertheless remand this cause to the trial court…