From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jul 5, 2012
97 A.D.3d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-07-5

In the Matter of Harold J. SCOTT, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Harold J. Scott, Elmira, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Harold J. Scott, Elmira, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Torres v. Bezio, 92 A.D.3d 1053, 937 N.Y.S.2d 900 [2012];Matter of Calix v. Brown, 92 A.D.3d 1001, 937 N.Y.S.2d 639 [2012] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

MERCURE, J.P., LAHTINEN, MALONE JR., McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scott v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jul 5, 2012
97 A.D.3d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Scott v. Prack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Harold J. SCOTT, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Acting…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 5, 2012

Citations

97 A.D.3d 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5351
947 N.Y.S.2d 347

Citing Cases

Walker v. Fischer

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…

Owens v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed,…