From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Marcus Whitman Central School

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 13, 2003
306 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 02-02137

June 13, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Ontario County (Doran, J.), entered June 14, 2002, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.

STEPHEN D. ARONSON, CANANDAIGUA, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

OSBORN, REED BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (AIMEE LA FEVER KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, PINE, WISNER, AND LAWTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries she sustained when she allegedly slipped and fell on a puddle of water in the doorway of an elementary school owned by defendant and under its control. Defendant met its initial burden by establishing that it did not create the allegedly dangerous condition and that it had neither actual nor constructive notice of that condition ( see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837-838; Collins v. Grand Union Co., 201 A.D.2d 852), and plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact ( see generally Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562).


Summaries of

Scott v. Marcus Whitman Central School

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 13, 2003
306 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Scott v. Marcus Whitman Central School

Case Details

Full title:GERTRUDE H. SCOTT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARCUS WHITMAN CENTRAL SCHOOL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 13, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 321

Citing Cases

O'Neil v. Holiday Health & Fitness Centers of New York, Inc.

raised a triable issue of fact whether the danger presented by the water on the floor was unreasonably…