From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 13, 2012
No. 2:12CV00190 SWW-BD (E.D. Ark. Nov. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12CV00190 SWW-BD

11-13-2012

DEVERICK SCOTT ADC #131042 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Beth Deere has filed a Partial Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") screening Mr. Scott's complaint. The parties have not filed objections. After careful review of the Recommendation, the Court concludes that it should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings, in all respects.

Mr. Scott's claims against Defendants Hobbs, May, Naylor, Burl, Lockhart, Jones, Etherly, Burswell, and Grahm are DISMISSED, without prejudice. These Defendants are DISMISSED as party Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 13th day of November 2012.

Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Scott v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 13, 2012
No. 2:12CV00190 SWW-BD (E.D. Ark. Nov. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Scott v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:DEVERICK SCOTT ADC #131042 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 13, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12CV00190 SWW-BD (E.D. Ark. Nov. 13, 2012)