From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jul 31, 2014
119 A.D.3d 1307 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-07-31

In the Matter of Andre SCOTT, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Andre Scott, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Andre Scott, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Burroughs v. Martuscello, 111 A.D.3d 1208, 1208, 975 N.Y.S.2d 703 [2013] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs. LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, GARRY, ROSE and DEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scott v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jul 31, 2014
119 A.D.3d 1307 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Scott v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Andre SCOTT, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 31, 2014

Citations

119 A.D.3d 1307 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
119 A.D.3d 1307
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 5589

Citing Cases

Ramos v. Dep't of Corr.

The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…

Raduns v. Prack

Petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status she enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination…