From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scope v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
May 6, 2015
Civil No. 7:14-CV-002-O (N.D. Tex. May. 6, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No. 7:14-CV-002-O

05-06-2015

DANIEL MOSES SCOPE, TDCJ No. 1530351, Plaintiff, v. ADAM WRIGHT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and of the Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 13), I am of the opinion that the fact findings and conclusions of law set forth in the Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the findings of the Court.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Jonathan Eastep and Joseph Boyle are DISMISSED. Additionally, Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief by way of release from administrative segregation is DISMISSED.

The Court notes that Rick Thaler, who was named as a Defendant in Plaintiff's original complaint, has been removed as a Defendant in Plaintiff's amended complaint. See Amended Complaint, ECF No. 7. Rick Thaler is therefore DISMISSED as a party to this action.

SO ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2015.

/s/ _________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Scope v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
May 6, 2015
Civil No. 7:14-CV-002-O (N.D. Tex. May. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Scope v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL MOSES SCOPE, TDCJ No. 1530351, Plaintiff, v. ADAM WRIGHT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

Date published: May 6, 2015

Citations

Civil No. 7:14-CV-002-O (N.D. Tex. May. 6, 2015)

Citing Cases

Pack v. Collier

Although Miller and Richey are not movants in the Motion to Dismiss (see ECF No. 35), the Court may sua…

Curry v. Nash

See Koch v. Puckett, 907 F.2d 524, 530 (5th Cir. 1990); Davis v. Bragg, No. EP-10-CV-288-FM, 2011 WL 1868382,…