Opinion
Submitted February 14, 1930 —
Decided October 20, 1930.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 7 N.J. Mis. R. 635.
For the respondent, Arthur De Vincentis.
For the appellant, William A. Barkalow.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, CAMPBELL, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, DEAR, JJ. 10.
For reversal — KAYS, HETFIELD, WELLS, JJ. 3.