Opinion
June 20, 1988
Appeal from the Court of Claims (Lengyel, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In view of the absence in the claimant's moving papers of any information indicating the essential facts constituting the claim, or the nature of the wrong committed by the State, Court of Claims did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the claimant's motion for leave to file a late claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) (see, Malek v State of New York, 92 A.D.2d 659). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Weinstein and Balletta, JJ., concur.