Opinion
3:22-cv-273
04-15-2024
TIMOTHY JAMES SCHWEITZER, Plaintiff, v. J.W. DAGLE, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
JEFFREY VINCENT BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On February 16, 2023, all pretrial matters in this case were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Dkt. 23. Judge Edison filed an amended memorandum and recommendation on March 27, 2024, recommending all the defendants' motions to dismiss (Dkts. 74, 79, 80, 82) be granted (Dkt. 99).
No objections have been filed to the amended memorandum and recommendation. Accordingly, the court reviews it for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly:
(1) Judge Edison's amended memorandum and recommendation (Dkt. 99) is approved and adopted in its entirety as the holding of the court; and
(2) the defendants' motions to dismiss (Dkts. 74, 79, 80, 82) are granted.