From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A

Supreme Court of California
Feb 21, 1930
209 Cal. 779 (Cal. 1930)

Opinion

Docket No. S.F. 13706.

February 21, 1930.

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles and W.B. Thompson, Judge thereof, to settle a proposed statement on appeal. Peremptory writ issued.

Henry Haves and W.L. Engelhardt for Petitioner.

Lloyd S. Nix, City Prosecutor, and Joe W. Matherly and F.W. Fellows, Deputies City Prosecutor, for Respondents.


THE COURT.

[1] Upon the authority of Hansen v. Municipal Court, 208 Cal. 506 [ 282 P. 384], and Keaton v. Municipal Court (L.A. No. 11849), ante, p. 52 [ 285 P. 696], this day decided, we are of the opinion that the peremptory writ of mandate should be issued as prayed for, and it is so ordered.


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A

Supreme Court of California
Feb 21, 1930
209 Cal. 779 (Cal. 1930)
Case details for

Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN SCHWARTZ, Petitioner, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Feb 21, 1930

Citations

209 Cal. 779 (Cal. 1930)
285 P. 698