From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 28, 1963
190 N.E.2d 253 (N.Y. 1963)

Opinion

Submitted March 25, 1963

Decided March 28, 1963


Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that the Statute of Limitations commenced to run in 1957, when he first was able to discover an injury caused by a 1944 injection of a carcinogenic substance, and that a holding by this court as a matter of law that the actionable injury was sustained prior to that time would deprive appellant of due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court of Appeals held that in an action for personal injuries caused by negligence the cause of action accrues and the Statute of Limitations commences to run when the negligence produces injury, and that the injury occurred when the harmful substance first acted upon appellant's body, at or about the time of injection in 1944, appellant's lack of knowledge notwithstanding.


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 28, 1963
190 N.E.2d 253 (N.Y. 1963)
Case details for

Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corporation

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN C. SCHWARTZ, Appellant, v. HEYDEN NEWPORT CHEMICAL CORPORATION et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 28, 1963

Citations

190 N.E.2d 253 (N.Y. 1963)
239 N.Y.S.2d 896
12 N.Y.2d 1073

Citing Cases

PAUL v. STATE OF NY

It has generally been held that a cause of action arises at the time the injury is inflicted or the…

De Groff v. State

Under these circumstances, we conclude that the Court of Claims abused its discretion in finding that a…