From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwabinger v. Saxon

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 22, 1920
110 A. 15 (Ch. Div. 1920)

Opinion

No. 46-408.

03-22-1920

SCHWABINGER v. SAXON et al.

Harry A. Scher, of Newark, for complainant. Stein, Stein & Hannoch, of Newark, for defendants.


Suit by Oscar Schwabinger against John Saxon and others. Decree for defendants.

Harry A. Scher, of Newark, for complainant.

Stein, Stein & Hannoch, of Newark, for defendants.

FIELDER, V. C. Without expressing an opinion on any other question raised in the case, I conclude that complainant must be denied the relief he seeks because section 39 of the Conveyance Act, Compiled Statutes 1547, as amended by P. L. 1918, p. 119, has not been complied with. That section provides that no estate of a married woman in lands shall pass by her deed without a previous acknowledgment made by her that she signed, sealed, and delivered the same as her voluntary act and deed; the officer having first made known to her the contents thereof. A contract for the sale of her interest in lands must comply with this statute. Chassman v. Wiese, 106 Atl. 19. Although the contract in this case bears a certificate of acknowledgment in due form, I find from the testimony, including that of the officer who signed the certificate, that the acknowledgment required by the statute was in fact not made by Mrs. Saxon. The blank form of agreement to convey was not entirely filled in when she signed it, and, although it may be that she told the scrivener, who was the officer who certified the acknowledgment, that she knew What terms and conditions were to be inserted and authorized him to complete the draft and that, when completed, the agreement was in the form she understood it was to be, the officer could not have complied with the statute by making the contents known to her and she did not acknowledge that she signed, sealed, and delivered a completed contract as her voluntary act and deed.

Our law guards the conveyance by a married woman of any interest in her lands with a special care. It makes it the duty of the officer taking her acknowledgment to explain to her the contents of a completed instrument, and then to ascertain from her whether she has willingly affixed her signature thereto, and it gives her up to the point, when she is made acquainted with the actual contents of the instrument, an opportunity to declare any objection she may have to executing and delivering it.

The defendants must return to complainant the amount of the deposit paid by him on the contract, with interest from the date of payment, and the complainant must deliver up the contract to the defendants for cancellation.

No costs will be allowed either party.


Summaries of

Schwabinger v. Saxon

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 22, 1920
110 A. 15 (Ch. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Schwabinger v. Saxon

Case Details

Full title:SCHWABINGER v. SAXON et al.

Court:COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Mar 22, 1920

Citations

110 A. 15 (Ch. Div. 1920)

Citing Cases

Rittenhouse v. Swiecicki

It is next urged that the decree should be opened to permit an answer to be filed, setting forth as a defense…

Kotok v. Rossi

Nevertheless an acknowledgment and certificate of the modified character and form prescribed by the 1918…