Summary
In Schultz v. Stephan (1956), 8 Ill. App.2d 563, 132 N.E.2d 30, it was a question for the jury whether the evidence adequately demonstrated that plaintiff protested and warned the defendant to "slow down" with apparently no result and was free of contributory willful and wanton misconduct.
Summary of this case from Nacvich v. DowningOpinion
Gen. No. 10,870. (Abstract of Decision.)
February 15, 1956. Released for publication March 5, 1956.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lake county; the Hon. BERNARD M. DECKER, Judge, presiding. Judgment affirmed.
Hinshaw, Culbertson, Moelmann Hoban, and Snyder, Clarke Dalziel, for defendant-appellant;
Perry L. Fuller, of counsel;
Winston, Strawn, Black Towner, for plaintiff-appellee;
George B. Christensen, Frank B. Gilmer, Gerard E. Grashorn, and Edward J. Wendrow, of counsel.
Not to be published in full.