From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schuck v. 7309 Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 22, 1982
90 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

November 22, 1982


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buschmann, J.), entered June 3, 1982, which, after a hearing denied plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendant 7309 Corp.'s affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Accepting Special Term's resolution of the issue of the witnesses' credibility, the summons and complaint, which were left with the mother of an officer of defendant 7309 Corp., were not delivered to a person authorized to receive service for the corporation. Even though 7309 Corp. received notice of the action several days later when the papers were redelivered by the mother to her daughter, an officer who was a proper person to receive service, service was ineffective to confer personal jurisdiction under CPLR 311 ( McDonald v. Ames Supply Co., 27 A.D.2d 559, affd 22 N.Y.2d 111; cf. Fashion Page v. Zurich Ins. Co., 50 N.Y.2d 265). Damiani, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and Gulotta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schuck v. 7309 Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 22, 1982
90 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Schuck v. 7309 Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH SCHUCK, Appellant, v. 7309 CORP., Doing Business as WINNIE THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 22, 1982

Citations

90 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Moray v. Koven Krause, Esqs.

( Carder v Ramos, 163 AD2d 732; Firemen's Fund Ins. Co. v Dietz, 110 AD2d 1083; Elmhurst Iron Works v Alfieri…

Innovative Sports Mgmt. v. Triangle Eatery & Bar, LLC

Importantly, service on the family members of corporate personnel is insufficient, even if the Summons and…