Opinion
July 9, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court (Mugglin, J.).
Plaintiff commenced this action for false arrest, seeking to recover damages sustained in connection with his arrest in August 1996 on a charge of criminal mischief in the fourth degree. The arrest was precipitated by defendant's report to, and filing of a criminal information with, the Otsego County Sheriff's Department in which he averred that plaintiff had throw a an object at defendant's truck, denting it. After the criminal charge against him was dismissed, plaintiff instituted the instant action. Supreme Court subsequently granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm.
A civilian complainant cannot be held liable for false arrest where he has purely furnished information to legal authorities, who were then free to use their own judgment as to whether an arrest would be made or criminal charges filed ( see, Cobb v. Willis, 208 A.D.2d 1155, 1156). Under the circumstances presented here, Supreme Court quite rightly concluded that plaintiff failed to state a viable cause of action, rendering the complaint legally insufficient ( see, Collins v. Brown, 129 A.D.2d 902, 904).
Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.