From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schron v. New York University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 27, 2005
14 A.D.3d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5214

January 27, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered January 8, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on their Labor Law § 240 claim and denied defendants' cross motion for partial summary judgment dismissing said claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.


The plaintiff construction worker's deposition testimony that he was injured at the work site when a wooden scaffolding plank struck him on the head was prima facie evidence of a violation of section 240 (1), shifting the burden to the owner/manager defendants to raise a factual issue on liability ( see Aragon v. 233 W. 21st St., 201 AD2d 353, 354). Defendants failed to rebut adequately plaintiffs' showing.


Summaries of

Schron v. New York University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 27, 2005
14 A.D.3d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Schron v. New York University

Case Details

Full title:SEAN SCHRON et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 27, 2005

Citations

14 A.D.3d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
788 N.Y.S.2d 386

Citing Cases

Yulfo v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc.

Additionally, there is no minimum height differential for a violation to occur, nor does it matter whether…

Arias v. Extell 4110 LLC

See Hill v City of New York, 140 AD3d 568, 570 (1st Dept. 2016). Rather, it is sufficient for the purposes of…