From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schriber v. Buckner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 14, 1907
90 P. 10 (Okla. 1907)

Opinion

Filed February 14, 1907.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Case Made. On the authority of Sawyer Lumber Company v. Champlin Lumber Company, 16 Okla. 90 Held: That the record contains no sufficient averment that the case contained all the evidence introduced on the trial.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from the District Court of Garfield County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

W. S. Denton and R. L. Denton, for plaintiff in error.

Houston Buckner, and Geo. W. Buckner for defendant in error.


Opinion of the court by


This cause is presented by petition in error and case made duly authenticated.

The defendant in error upon a trial before a jury recovered a verdict and judgment for $145.00 and costs for services as attorney for the plaintiff in error. The only errors relied upon are the lack of evidence to warrant the verdict, and the incorrectness of certain instructions. Neither of these propositions can be correctly determined without an examination of the evidence introduced on the trial. The case made contains no recital or averment that it contains all the evidence submitted on the trial of the cause. In the absence of such recital there is nothing for us to consider. Sawyer Lumber Co. v. Champlin Lumber Co., 16 Okla. 90, and cases cited.

Attached to the case is the following statement signed by counsel for defendant, to wit:

"The above and foregoing case made in the case of C. R. Buckner v. John Schriber, Sr., contains a full, true and correct copy and statement of all the pleadings, motions, judgments, entries and orders of court made in said cause, together with all the evidence and all the objections and exceptions made by either party to the orders or rulings of the court, and all the objections and exceptions made in said cause."

This statement does not supply the place of the averment required, that the case does contain all the evidence introduced on the trial of the cause.

The judgment of the district court of Garfield county is affirmed, at the costs of the plaintiff in error.

All the Justices concurring.


Summaries of

Schriber v. Buckner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 14, 1907
90 P. 10 (Okla. 1907)
Case details for

Schriber v. Buckner

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SCHRIBER v. C. R. BUCKNER

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 14, 1907

Citations

90 P. 10 (Okla. 1907)
90 P. 10

Citing Cases

Wagner v. Sattley Mfg. Co.

This court cannot therefore review the assignment of error urged. Exendine v. Goldstein, 14 Okla. 100, 77 P.…

SCH. DIST. NO. 38, LE FLORE CTY. v. SCH. DIST. NO. 92

This court cannot, in the absence of such recital or statement, consider an assignment which would require…