From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schramm v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Nov 15, 2011
Case No. 09-C-1197 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 15, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 09-C-1197

11-15-2011

SCOTT SCHRAMM, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Defendant.


ORDER REMANDING CASE

In accordance with Rule 12.1(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Seventh Circuit Rule 57, this Court indicated that it was inclined to grant the unopposed motion recently filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60, in the event the Court of Appeals remanded this case. The Court of Appeals has now remanded the action, and the Rule 60 motion will therefore be granted.

The case is REMANDED under sentence four. Upon remand, the ALJ will be directed to: (1) provide limitations for social functioning in Schramm's residual functional capacity, (2) ensure that all medical source opinions are properly weighed and evaluated, (3) properly evaluate and discuss all pertinent medical evidence and testimony, (4) evaluate and discuss all evidence received after the ALJ's hearing decision, and (5) re-evaluate Schramm's bipolar disorder in light of his subsequent suicide.

William C. Griesbach

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Schramm v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Nov 15, 2011
Case No. 09-C-1197 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Schramm v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT SCHRAMM, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

Case No. 09-C-1197 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 15, 2011)

Citing Cases

Watkins v. Colvin

Several courts in this circuit have found that, when a claimant has a non-attorney representative, the ALJ is…

Mueller v. Colvin

Plaintiff cites a number of decisions in which district courts have held that the obligation to question the…