From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schomaker v. All Persons

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Sep 16, 1921
54 Cal.App. 795 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that the permissive clause of section 3 grants the Commission authority to protect public health and safety

Summary of this case from Johnson Utilities, L.L.C. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm'n
See 3 Summaries

Opinion

Civ. No. 3941.

September 16, 1921.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George E. Crothers, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are identical with those stated in the opinion in Schomaker v. Roemer et al., ante, p. 528.

Reisner Honey for Appellant.

T. W. Hubbard and Hubbard Johnson for Respondents.

THE COURT. —

Upon the authority of Schomaker v. Roemer et al., ante, p. 528 [ 201 P. 803], the judgment herein is affirmed.

Summaries of

Schomaker v. All Persons

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Sep 16, 1921
54 Cal.App. 795 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)

holding that the permissive clause of section 3 grants the Commission authority to protect public health and safety

Summary of this case from Johnson Utilities, L.L.C. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm'n

stating that Eastern Railroad "involved the power of the Legislature to regulate the number of cars in a train and was clearly the exercise of the police power of the state for the safety, comfort, convenience, and health of employees of railroad companies"

Summary of this case from Johnson Utilities, L.L.C. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm'n

stating that concurrently with the Commission, the legislature may also exercise the "police power of the state for the safety, comfort, convenience, and health" of PSC employees

Summary of this case from Johnson Utilities, L.L.C. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm'n
Case details for

Schomaker v. All Persons

Case Details

Full title:JOHANN SCHOMAKER, Appellant, v. ALL PERSONS, etc., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: Sep 16, 1921

Citations

54 Cal.App. 795 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
201 P. 632

Citing Cases

Johnson Utilities, L.L.C. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm'n

Under the permissive clause, the Commission has authority to regulate PSCs to preserve and protect public…

Corporation Com. v. Pacific Greyhound L

All of these corporations are declared to be "subject to control by law" which, as we have said, clearly…

3 Citing Cases