From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schoen v. King Kullen Grocery Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 2002
296 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-08748

Submitted June 4, 2002

July 15, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated September 4, 2001, as granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Steven D. Dollinger Associates, Melville, N.Y. (Susan R. Nudelman of counsel), for appellant.

Kennedy Associates, P.C., Uniondale, N.Y. (Christopher F. Mansfield of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, THOMAS A. ADAMS, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

While shopping for groceries in the defendant's store, the plaintiff slipped and fell to the floor. She testified at an examination before trial that the fall occurred as she was reaching for tea on a shelf, when she stepped with her left foot onto a flat piece of cardboard on the floor, which slid. She further testified that when she entered the aisle with her grocery cart, she saw flat pieces of cardboard on the floor near the shelves, and a stock boy who was unpacking boxes. The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the flat cardboard on the floor did not constitute an inherently dangerous condition and "was readily observable by the reasonable use of the injured plaintiff's senses" (Connor v. Taylor Rental Ctr., 278 A.D.2d 270; see Chiranky v. Marshalls, Inc., 273 A.D.2d 266; Maravalli v. Home Depot U.S.A., 266 A.D.2d 437; Boehme v. Edgar Fabrics, 248 A.D.2d 344). Accordingly, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant (see Sandler v. Patel, 288 A.D.2d 459).

GOLDSTEIN, J.P., McGINITY, ADAMS and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schoen v. King Kullen Grocery Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 2002
296 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Schoen v. King Kullen Grocery Co.

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE SCHOEN, appellant, v. KING KULLEN GROCERY CO., INC., respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 15, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
745 N.Y.S.2d 554

Citing Cases

Villalba v. Daughney

In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Contrary to the plaintiff's contention,…

Vergara v. a S Twins Const

Here, the defendants submitted evidence sufficient to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of…