From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneider v. Saxon

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Sep 21, 1955
82 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 1955)

Opinion

September 21, 1955.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Joseph S. White, J.

Morrow, Fulton Sullivan, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Earnest, Lewis, Smith Jones, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Plaintiff instituted this suit against defendant to recover damages for personal injuries under the guest statute, Chapter 320.59, F.S.A. A motion to dismiss the amended complaint was granted on the theory that it showed a mere error of judgment on the part of defendant, whose guest the plaintiff was and that gross negligence was not shown. Final judgment was entered for defendant and the plaintiff appealed.

The only point for determination is whether or not the complaint stated a cause of action under the guest statute.

A majority of the court have reached the conclusion that this question requires an affirmative answer and being so, the judgment appealed from should be reversed on authority of Dexter v. Green, Fla. 1951, 55 So.2d 548, and Bridges v. Speer, Fla., 79 So.2d 679, decided May 13, 1955, headnotes 5, 6 and 7. It should not be overlooked that gross negligence in such cases is a question for the jury.

Reversed.

DREW, C.J., and THOMAS, HOBSON, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

SEBRING, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Schneider v. Saxon

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Sep 21, 1955
82 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 1955)
Case details for

Schneider v. Saxon

Case Details

Full title:HELEN M. SCHNEIDER, APPELLANT, v. EVELYN EDITH SAXON, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc

Date published: Sep 21, 1955

Citations

82 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 1955)

Citing Cases

Welch v. Moothart

The jury was acting under proper instructions, and it is to be remembered that gross negligence in such cases…

Foy v. Fleming

So far as the complaint reveals, this tragic collision could have been avoided by the exercise of `slight…