From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmidt v. Going

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri
Nov 3, 1938
25 F. Supp. 412 (W.D. Mo. 1938)

Summary

In Schmidt v. Going, D. C., 25 F.Supp. 412, a similar motion was sustained in this district, where the defendants sought to ascertain in what manner the defendants were negligent, and also the age of a minor daughter who had been killed in the accident.

Summary of this case from Employers' Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Wisconsin v. Blue Line Transfer Co.

Opinion


25 F.Supp. 412 (W.D.Mo. 1938) SCHMIDT v. GOING et al. No. 11. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri Nov. 3, 1938

        Madden, Freeman & Madden, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

        Wolfe & Sullivan, of Kansas City, Mo., for defendants.

        REEVES, District Judge.

        This is a suit for personal injuries accruing to plaintiff in an automobile collision. The petition is in three counts. Plaintiff seeks compensation for her own injuries in the first count; compensation for the death of her husband in the second count, and compensation for the death of her daughter upon whom she depended for support on the third count. The petition is commendably brief.

        In relation to the cause of the collision, plaintiff averred: 'Said automobiles, by and through the negligence of defendants were caused to collide violently, injuring plaintiff severely', etc.

        This averment was repeated by reference in the succeeding counts.

        The defendants, by their motion for a more definite statement, ask for the following: (a) In what manner the defendants were negligent; (b) the age of plaintiff's daughter, Dulcie, when she was killed.

        By paragraph (e) of Rule 12 of the New Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c: 'A party may move for a more definite statement or for a bill of particulars of any matter which is not averred with sufficient definiteness or particularity to enable him properly to prepare his responsive pleading or to prepare for trial.'

        In this case the defendants have complied with the provisions of this rule by pointing out 'the details desired.' In preparation for trial, and to enable the defendants properly to prepare their responsive pleadings, they are entitled to the 'details desired' thus pointed out.

        The plaintiff may, in a supplemental pleading, specify the negligent acts which caused the collision, and in like manner, tell the age of her deceased daughter. This can all be done in a few words.

        Defendnats' motion will therefore be granted. It is so ordered.

        Plaintiff will be given ten days within which to file amendment.


Summaries of

Schmidt v. Going

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri
Nov 3, 1938
25 F. Supp. 412 (W.D. Mo. 1938)

In Schmidt v. Going, D. C., 25 F.Supp. 412, a similar motion was sustained in this district, where the defendants sought to ascertain in what manner the defendants were negligent, and also the age of a minor daughter who had been killed in the accident.

Summary of this case from Employers' Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Wisconsin v. Blue Line Transfer Co.
Case details for

Schmidt v. Going

Case Details

Full title:SCHMIDT v. GOING et al.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Missouri

Date published: Nov 3, 1938

Citations

25 F. Supp. 412 (W.D. Mo. 1938)

Citing Cases

Webb v. Webb

In view of the plaintiff's suggestion that this is a res ipsa loquitur case, and in view of the fact that…

Millsap v. Lotz

         This pronouncement of Judge Gourley is in strict accord with all of the authorities.          …