From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SCHMIDT v. DJO, LLC

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 2, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02683-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02683-WYD-MEH.

August 2, 2010


ORDER


In light of the dismissal of Defendants Abbott Laboratories and Abbot Laboratories, Inc, it is

ORDERED that the Second, Fifth, Seventh and Ninth Claims for Relief, which are asserted exclusively as to those Defendants, are DISMISSED. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Abbott Laboratories and Abbot Laboratories, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and Joinder in Defendants I-Flow Corporation's Motion to Dismiss and DJO, LLC's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 27 filed February 16, 2010) is DENIED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

SCHMIDT v. DJO, LLC

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 2, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02683-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 2, 2010)
Case details for

SCHMIDT v. DJO, LLC

Case Details

Full title:ERIC SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. DJO, LLC; and I-FLOW CORPORATION; Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Aug 2, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02683-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 2, 2010)

Citing Cases

David v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc.

This claim is subject to the same three-year statute of limitations as Plainitff's express warranty claim,…