From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmidt v. DirecTV, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Feb 9, 2016
Civil No. 14-3000 (JRT/JSM) (D. Minn. Feb. 9, 2016)

Opinion

Civil No. 14-3000 (JRT/JSM)

02-09-2016

GEORGE SCHMIDT, JR., et al, Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTV, LLC, et al, Defendants.

Crystal R. Cook, George Hanson, Lauren Luhrs, Ryan O'Dell, STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP, 460 Nichols Road, Suite 200, Kansas City, MO 64112, Paul J. Lukas, NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP, 80 South Eighth Street, Suite 4600, Minneapolis, MN 55402-2242, for plaintiffs, Aaron Mills Scott, Colin Doughterty, Elizabeth Patton, Joseph Winandy, Thomas Mastroianni, FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP, 222 South Ninth Street, Suite 2000, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for defendants.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Crystal R. Cook, George Hanson, Lauren Luhrs, Ryan O'Dell, STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP, 460 Nichols Road, Suite 200, Kansas City, MO 64112, Paul J. Lukas, NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP, 80 South Eighth Street, Suite 4600, Minneapolis, MN 55402-2242, for plaintiffs, Aaron Mills Scott, Colin Doughterty, Elizabeth Patton, Joseph Winandy, Thomas Mastroianni, FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP, 222 South Ninth Street, Suite 2000, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for defendants.

The above matter came before the undersigned on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated January 22, 2016. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all of the files, records and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant DIRECTV, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 101] and DirectSat USA, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 102] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

(a). Defendants' motion as to Count I (plaintiffs' claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act) is DENIED.

(b). Defendants' motion as to Count II (plaintiffs' claims arising under Minn. Stat. § 181.722) is GRANTED and these claims are dismissed with prejudice.

2. Plaintiffs' Conditional Motion for Time Within Which to Seek Leave to Amend Should Court Grant Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 112] is DENIED AS MOOT. DATED: February 9, 2016
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

s/John R. Tunheim

JOHN R. TUNHEIM

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Schmidt v. DirecTV, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Feb 9, 2016
Civil No. 14-3000 (JRT/JSM) (D. Minn. Feb. 9, 2016)
Case details for

Schmidt v. DirecTV, LLC

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE SCHMIDT, JR., et al, Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTV, LLC, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Feb 9, 2016

Citations

Civil No. 14-3000 (JRT/JSM) (D. Minn. Feb. 9, 2016)

Citing Cases

Sigui v. M&M Commc'ns, Inc.

As the majority of cases to consider similar facts on a motion to dismiss have held, these allegations are…

Rapczynski v. Directv, LLC

In sum, the Court finds no deficiency in Plaintiffs' allegations as to their employment that could justify…