From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmerz v. Salon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 20, 1967
227 N.E.2d 322 (N.Y. 1967)

Opinion

Argued April 5, 1967

Decided April 20, 1967

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, FRANK J. PINO, J.

Richard T. Sinrod, E. Edan Spencer and Robert D. Foglia for appellant.

Jerome L. Spiegelman for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL.


Summaries of

Schmerz v. Salon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 20, 1967
227 N.E.2d 322 (N.Y. 1967)
Case details for

Schmerz v. Salon

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD SCHMERZ, Respondent, v. PHIL SALON, Doing Business as PHIL SALON'S…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 20, 1967

Citations

227 N.E.2d 322 (N.Y. 1967)
227 N.E.2d 322
280 N.Y.S.2d 409

Citing Cases

RUIZ v. YOUNG MEN'S CHRIST. ASSN. OF GR. N.Y.

This raises a factual dispute whether the maintenance person expected to find debris (like beads) on the gym…

REYNOSO v. CAROLINE APTS. PRESERV., L.P.

Even if Caroline Apt and Pan Am did not have notice of a dangerous condition, there are disputed triable…