From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schiavone Constr. Co. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 2, 1993
191 A.D.2d 152 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 2, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.).


Plaintiff's contract with the municipal defendant provided for a shortened six-month limitations period to commence running from the date of the filing of the certificate of completion with the Comptroller's office. The certificate of completion having been filed on September 25, 1989, commencement of the action on May 8, 1990 was untimely. A six-month limitations period in a municipal contract has been upheld as reasonable, as has a corresponding provision that no notice of the filing with the Comptroller's office need be given to the contractor (Applied Elec. Corp. v. City of New York, Sup Ct, N.Y. County, Nardelli, J., index No. 47053/88, affd for reasons stated 173 A.D.2d 313). There is no merit to plaintiff's arguments that under the contract, the limitations period was to commence running upon the date of final payment, or that it was misled by defendant's actions.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Ellerin and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Schiavone Constr. Co. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 2, 1993
191 A.D.2d 152 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Schiavone Constr. Co. v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:SCHIAVONE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., and DAIDONE ELECTRIC OF N.Y., INC., a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 2, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 152 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
594 N.Y.S.2d 27

Citing Cases

Moykher v. Mahoney Cohen & Co. P.C.

Plaintiff has not shown either in the prior motion for summary judgment or upon the instant motion for…

Moykher v. Mahoney Cohen Co., P.C.

Courts in this state have upheld agreements reducing the limitations period to six months or even shorter…