From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scheurer v. Xerox Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 11, 1999
258 A.D.2d 332 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 11, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.).


The motion court properly directed the parties to appear for a conference for the purpose of working out a disclosure schedule, in effect vacating defendant's 90-day notice, where the delay caused by plaintiffs failure to provide promised further responses to defendant's disclosure demands was not so extensive as to be indicative of an inclination not to proceed with the action (cf., Baczkowski v. Collins Constr. Co., 89 N.Y.2d 499, 503-504). A failure to comply with disclosure obligations is not necessarily tantamount to a failure to prosecute.

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Lerner, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Scheurer v. Xerox Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 11, 1999
258 A.D.2d 332 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Scheurer v. Xerox Corporation

Case Details

Full title:TRICIA SCHEURER, Respondent, v. XEROX CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 11, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 332 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
683 N.Y.S.2d 846

Citing Cases

Ramon v. Zangari

n intent to abandon it. The plaintiff and the defendants Teresa Zangari and De Maria Realty Corp.…