From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schell v. McSpedon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 2, 2014
119 A.D.3d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-07-2

In the Matter of Elizabeth SCHELL, respondent, v. John A. McSPEDON, appellant.


Andrew W. Szczesniak, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Greenwald, J.), dated June 27, 2013, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Hochberg, S.M.), dated April 5, 2013, which, after a hearing, inter alia, found that he willfully violated a prior order of child support and directed that a money judgment be entered in favor of the mother and against him.

ORDERED that the order dated June 27, 2013, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court correctly denied the father's objections to the Support Magistrate's determinations. Evidence of the father's failure to pay child support as ordered constituted prima facie evidence of a willful violation ( seeFamily Ct. Act § 454[3][a]; Matter of Powers v. Powers, 86 N.Y.2d 63, 69, 629 N.Y.S.2d 984, 653 N.E.2d 1154;Matter of Signorile v. Kaminski, 116 A.D.3d 961, 983 N.Y.S.2d 826). The burden then shifted to the father to offer competent, credible evidence of his inability to make the required payments ( see Matter of Powers v. Powers, 86 N.Y.2d at 69, 629 N.Y.S.2d 984, 653 N.E.2d 1154;Matter of Signorile v. Kaminski, 116 A.D.3d 961, 983 N.Y.S.2d 826). The father failed to sustain this burden. Although he asserted that he was unemployed and had no money to pay child support, he did not present competent, credible evidence that he had actively sought employment sufficient to rebut the mother's prima facie showing ( see Matter of Signorile v. Kaminski, 116 A.D.3d 961, 983 N.Y.S.2d 826;Matter of Logue v. Abell, 97 A.D.3d 582, 583, 947 N.Y.S.2d 329;Matter of Cooper v. Robertson, 69 A.D.3d 714, 892 N.Y.S.2d 522;cf. Matter of Brennan v. Burger, 63 A.D.3d 922, 923, 882 N.Y.S.2d 181).

The father's remaining contentions are without merit. SKELOS, J.P., CHAMBERS, DUFFY and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schell v. McSpedon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 2, 2014
119 A.D.3d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Schell v. McSpedon

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Elizabeth SCHELL, respondent, v. John A. McSPEDON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 2, 2014

Citations

119 A.D.3d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4945
987 N.Y.S.2d 893

Citing Cases

Stoll v. Stoll

The Family Court properly confirmed the Support Magistrate's finding that the father willfully failed to pay…

Maharaj-Ellis v. Laroche

The mother established that the subject child was a competitive ice skater, and that the father failed to…