Opinion
24-1451
07-30-2024
KRISTIN E. SCHELIN; MARK WATSON, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. KARL LINARD MALLOY, Defendant-Appellant.
Karl Linard Malloy, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Lawrence Perkins, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN &MELLOTT, LLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: July 25, 2024.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond (3:24-cv-00002-MHL), M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge.
Karl Linard Malloy, Appellant Pro Se.
Christopher Lawrence Perkins, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN &MELLOTT, LLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Karl Linard Malloy seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his emergency motion for a stay of the bankruptcy court's order pending resolution of his appeal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Malloy seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED