From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schechner v. Zipser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 1950
277 App. Div. 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Summary

In Schechner v. Zipser (89 N.Y.S.2d 354, 355, affd. without opinion 277 App. Div. 843 [1st Dept.]) the court said: "The claim that the statute of frauds constitutes a good defense to the action because the writing sued upon does not state the consideration for the promise must be overruled.

Summary of this case from Fain v. Irvington Knitting Mills, Inc.

Opinion

June 6, 1950.

Present — Peck, P.J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion.


Summaries of

Schechner v. Zipser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 1950
277 App. Div. 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

In Schechner v. Zipser (89 N.Y.S.2d 354, 355, affd. without opinion 277 App. Div. 843 [1st Dept.]) the court said: "The claim that the statute of frauds constitutes a good defense to the action because the writing sued upon does not state the consideration for the promise must be overruled.

Summary of this case from Fain v. Irvington Knitting Mills, Inc.
Case details for

Schechner v. Zipser

Case Details

Full title:NORA SCHECHNER, Respondent, v. CHARLOTTE C. ZIPSER, as Administratrix of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 6, 1950

Citations

277 App. Div. 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Fain v. Irvington Knitting Mills, Inc.

" The court found it unnecessary, however, to decide the point. In Schechner v. Zipser (89 N.Y.S.2d 354, 355,…