From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schaumburg v. Lindsay

Appellate Court of Illinois
Jun 14, 1946
329 Ill. App. 190 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)

Opinion

Gen. No. 10,087. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 14, 1946 Released for publication July 2, 1946

INJUNCTIONS, § 215motion to dissolve injunction as waiver of irregularities in issuance of same. Where temporary injunction was issued to restrain defendants from interfering with plaintiffs in going to and from their work, and defendants moved to dissolve such injunction on ground that no bond or notice of hearing was given in connection with application for such injunction, held that such objections had been waived since motion to dissolve operated as waiver of irregularities.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Rock Island county; the Hon. LEONARD E. TELLEEN, Judge, presiding.

Order affirmed. Heard in this court at the February term, 1946.

Stewart R. Winstein and Meyers Meyers, for appellants;

Stewart R. Winstein, of counsel;

Oakleaf Churchill, for appellees;

Cyrus Churchill, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed June 14, 1946; released for publication July 2, 1946.


Summaries of

Schaumburg v. Lindsay

Appellate Court of Illinois
Jun 14, 1946
329 Ill. App. 190 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
Case details for

Schaumburg v. Lindsay

Case Details

Full title:L. F. Schaumburg et al., Appellees, v. Allen M. Lindsay et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Jun 14, 1946

Citations

329 Ill. App. 190 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
67 N.E.2d 409

Citing Cases

Streamwood Home Builders, Inc. v. Brolin

A court's failure to do so might be an abuse of discretion, as I think it was in the instant case. So far as…

Atkinson Trust Sav. Bank v. DeRoo

The purpose of requiring a bond of the plaintiff is to assure to the defendant in the event the temporary…