From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schatzberg v. Schatzberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

June, 1927.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Bronx County.

Present — Dowling, P.J., Finch, Martin, O'Malley and Proskauer, JJ.; Martin, J., dissenting. Orders reversed and motions denied, with leave to plaintiff to renew her applications upon additional papers.


We are of the opinion that the doctrine of Lawrence v. Lawrence ( 202 App. Div. 844) is applicable to this case. Until the plaintiff shows to the satisfaction of the court misconduct on the part of the defendant which justified her separation from him after the reconciliation, she should not be permitted to vacate the order of discontinuance or to enforce the provisions for alimony contained in the original decree. The orders appealed from should be reversed and the motions denied, with leave to the plaintiff to renew her applications upon additional papers.


Summaries of

Schatzberg v. Schatzberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Schatzberg v. Schatzberg

Case Details

Full title:ANNIE SCHATZBERG, Respondent, v. LOUIS SCHATZBERG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1927

Citations

220 App. Div. 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)