From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scharp v. DiNapoli

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 21, 2013
104 A.D.3d 1041 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-21

In the Matter of Frank J. SCHARP, Petitioner, v. Thomas P. DiNAPOLI, as State Comptroller, et al., Respondents.

Pasternack, Tilker, Ziegler, Walsh, Stanton & Romano, LLP, Garden City (Jordan Ziegler of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondents.



Pasternack, Tilker, Ziegler, Walsh, Stanton & Romano, LLP, Garden City (Jordan Ziegler of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondents.
Before: ROSE, J.P., STEIN, SPAIN and EGAN JR., JJ.

STEIN, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a police officer for almost 30 years, was injured in March 2008 while evacuating an injured person from his home when a wheeled stretcher collapsed, dropping two feet and wrenching petitioner's back. The employer thereafter submitted an application on behalf of petitioner for accidental disability retirement benefits. Following proceedings, the Hearing Officer determined that petitioner was entitled to such benefits. Upon review, respondent Comptroller disagreed and denied benefits, finding that the collapse of the stretcher should have been an expected or foreseeable event and, therefore, the incident was not an accident. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We annul. A petitioner seeking disability retirement benefits bears the burden of proving entitlement, that is, that the underlying incident constituted a “ ‘sudden, fortuitous, out of the ordinary and unexpected event that does not result from an activity undertaken in the performance of regular or routine employment duties' ” ( Matter of Ashley v. DiNapoli, 97 A.D.3d 1057, 1058, 949 N.Y.S.2d 526 [2012], quoting Matter of Carroll v. DiNapoli, 95 A.D.3d 1498, 1499, 945 N.Y.S.2d 428 [2012];see Matter of Murphy v. New York State Comptroller, 92 A.D.3d 1022, 1022, 937 N.Y.S.2d 721 [2012] ). Here, while the removal of an injured person using a wheeled stretcher was undoubtedly part of petitioner's job, the record does not support the Comptroller's finding that the collapse of the stretcher was a foreseeable occurrence. Both petitioner and a fellow police officer testified that they had assisted with using similar devices on hundreds of occasions in their 20–plus years of service and had never witnessed a collapse. Moreover, the ambulance medical technician who assisted at the scene testified that in more than 20 years on the job—during which he had used similar stretchers over 500 times a year—he had only seen the legs collapse on five or six occasions. Accordingly, we do not find the Comptroller's determination to be supported by substantial evidence ( see Matter of O'Neill v. DiNapoli, 83 A.D.3d 1280, 1281, 920 N.Y.S.2d 837 [2011];see also Matter of Sammon v. DiNapoli, 97 A.D.3d 952, 948 N.Y.S.2d 719 [2012];compare Matter of Allesandro v. DiNapoli, 68 A.D.3d 1592, 1594–1595, 892 N.Y.S.2d 602 [2009],lv. denied14 N.Y.3d 705, 2010 WL 1189827 [2010] ).

ADJUDGED that the determination is annulled, without costs, and matter remitted to respondent Comptroller for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.

ROSE J.P., SPAIN and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scharp v. DiNapoli

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 21, 2013
104 A.D.3d 1041 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Scharp v. DiNapoli

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Frank J. SCHARP, Petitioner, v. Thomas P. DiNAPOLI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 1041 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
961 N.Y.S.2d 599
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1890

Citing Cases

Loia v. DiNapoli

Under these circumstances, the precipitating external event, i.e., the flipping down of the folding step, was…

Hamblin v. DiNapoli

was sudden, unexpected and not a risk in his ordinary employment duties. As petitioner's testimony reflects,…