From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schapiro v. Town of North Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 20, 1970
35 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

July 20, 1970


In an action by owners of property in the Town of North Hempstead to declare that an amendment of the Town Zoning Ordinance, adopted on February 18, 1969, is invalid, and to enjoin the town and its officials from taking any action pursuant to such amendment, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 3, 1970 in favor of defendants after a nonjury trial on the ground that plaintiffs failed to show that they are aggrieved parties. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs have failed to show that they or their property are especially affected by the amendment to the ordinance in question or that they are sustaining a pecuniary loss by reason thereof ( Marcus v. Village of Mamaroneck, 283 N.Y. 325; Rice v. Van Vranken, 225 App. Div. 179, affd. 255 N.Y. 541; Rose v. City of New Rochelle, 19 Misc.2d 599). Rabin, Acting P.J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schapiro v. Town of North Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 20, 1970
35 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

Schapiro v. Town of North Hempstead

Case Details

Full title:MARILYN SCHAPIRO et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF NORTH HEMPSTEAD et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 20, 1970

Citations

35 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Matter of Unitarian Univ. Ch. v. Shorten

Movants made out a prima facie case by proof that their properties abutted and were across the street from…

Matter of Douglaston Civic Ass'n v. Galvin

It is further alleged that the proposed apartment house would greatly increase motor traffic in a block…