From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schager v. Durland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 17, 2001
286 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted June 27, 2001.

September 17, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Richard Marcus and Marilyn Marcus appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), dated August 12, 2000, as denied their motion to compel the plaintiffs to provide authorizations to obtain certain medical and other records.

Mead, Hecht, Conklin Gallagher, LLP, Mamaroneck, N.Y. (Kevin T. Conklin and Sara Luca Salvi of counsel), for appellants.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, NANCY E. SMITH, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The injured plaintiff placed his physical and mental condition in controversy. The Supreme Court therefore erred in denying the appellants' motion (see, Prink v. Rockefeller Center, 48 N.Y.2d 309).


Summaries of

Schager v. Durland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 17, 2001
286 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Schager v. Durland

Case Details

Full title:ANNE L. SCHAGER, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. DANFORTH DURLAND, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 17, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 725 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
730 N.Y.S.2d 455

Citing Cases

Tucker v. Budget Rent a Car System, Inc.

Here, plaintiff affirmatively placed her medical condition in controversy through allegations of injury and…

Moore v. Metro. Transp. Auth.

]; Dibble v Consol. Rail Corp., 181 AD2d 1040 [4th Dept 1992] [Plaintiff directed to disclose medical…