From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schadel v. Honig

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 18, 1926
134 A. 919 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Submitted May 28, 1926 —

Decided October 18, 1926.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 56.

For the appellant, Michael Breitkopf.

For the respondent, Frank G. Turner.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Schadel v. Honig

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 18, 1926
134 A. 919 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Schadel v. Honig

Case Details

Full title:HARRY D. SCHADEL, RESPONDENT, v. IGNATZ HONIG, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 18, 1926

Citations

134 A. 919 (N.J. 1926)
134 A. 919

Citing Cases

Leonard's of Plainfield, Inc. v. Dybas

" Katzin v. Jenny, 74 N.J.L. 131. A formal sealed exception is not requisite, but it is essential that an…