From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scarborough v. Zimmon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 1983
453 N.E.2d 530 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued June 1, 1983

Decided June 30, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, MYRON E. TILLMAN, J.

Brian J. Barney for appellants.

Richard S. Tubiolo for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In this case the Appellate Division did not reverse the order of Special Term as a matter of law, but rather in the exercise of its own discretion as a substitute for that of Special Term. That it was authorized to do, and we cannot conclude that in so doing it erred as a matter of law ( Scarborough v Zimmon, 56 N.Y.2d 784).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER and MEYER concur; Judge SIMONS taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Scarborough v. Zimmon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 1983
453 N.E.2d 530 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Scarborough v. Zimmon

Case Details

Full title:LUCILLE M. SCARBOROUGH et al., Appellants, v. DAVID S. ZIMMON et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 30, 1983

Citations

453 N.E.2d 530 (N.Y. 1983)
453 N.E.2d 530
466 N.Y.S.2d 301

Citing Cases

Scarborough v. Zimmon

Decided September 15, 1983 Appeal from ( 59 N.Y.2d 945) MOTIONS FOR REARGUMENT OR…

Sammons v. Freer

This omission prevents plaintiff from succeeding on her motion and the complaint must be dismissed (see,…