Summary
stating that Rule 31 affords mediators immunity for conduct undertaken in the course of Rule 31 ADR proceedings
Summary of this case from Wilder v. SwannOpinion
Case No. 3:10-0327.
December 2, 2010
ORDER
For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Renewed Motion of Stites Harbison, PLLC and James G. Martin, III as Mediator, to Dismiss (Docket No. 42), Defendant Celia Woolverton's Renewed Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Docket No. 44), and the Renewed Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Judge James G. Martin, III (Docket No. 45) are GRANTED and this case is hereby DISMISSED. This dismissal is on the merits except as to the state law claims against Stites Harbison — claims over which the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction. Entry of this Order shall constitute the judgment in this case.
It is so ordered.
Enter this 2nd day of December 2010.