From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satterfield v. Long

Court of Appeals of Tennessee. at Knoxville
Mar 16, 2000
No. E1999-00349-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 16, 2000)

Opinion

No. E1999-00349-COA-R3-CV.

March 16, 2000.

Appeal from Knox Circuit.


OPINION ON SECOND PETITION TO REHEAR


In light of an opinion of the Supreme Court, which was filed subsequent to our opinion denying the first petition to rehear in this case (Brown v. Wal-Mart, No. M1997-00138-SC-R11-CV), the Court granted Plaintiff Ronald Stephen Satterfield, Sr., leave to file a second petition to rehear.

Upon considering the petition, along with the response and the Supreme Court case above noted, we conclude the second petition to rehear is meritorious and amend our original opinion to provide that the entire judgment for compensatory damages of $80,000.00 shall be adjudged against the Defendant Gary Long.

Costs incident to the petition to rehear are adjudged against Mr. Long.

Houston M. Goddard, P.J.

CONCUR: Charles D. Susano, Jr., J., William H. Inman, Sr. J.


Summaries of

Satterfield v. Long

Court of Appeals of Tennessee. at Knoxville
Mar 16, 2000
No. E1999-00349-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 16, 2000)
Case details for

Satterfield v. Long

Case Details

Full title:RONALD STEPHEN SATTERFIELD, SR., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GARY LONG and…

Court:Court of Appeals of Tennessee. at Knoxville

Date published: Mar 16, 2000

Citations

No. E1999-00349-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 16, 2000)

Citing Cases

Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese

. Moto Photo, Inc., 828 S.W.2d 747 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1991) (telling customer that sexually explicit photographs…