From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satra Corporation v. Pullman Incorporated

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 14, 1984
102 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

June 14, 1984


Order, Supreme Court, New York County (H. Cahn, J.), entered March 26, 1983, granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its first cause of action for an accounting, referring the accounting to a referee, and denying defendant's cross motion for summary judgment, is unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing so much of the order as grants plaintiff's motion for summary judgment for an accounting and directs a reference of accounting, and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied, and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs. ¶ It cannot be said as a matter of law that plaintiff has shown such a fiduciary or trust relationship to the subject matter of the controversy as to form a basis for the equitable remedy of accounting.

Concur — Sandler, J.P., Sullivan, Carro, Silverman and Milonas, JJ.


Summaries of

Satra Corporation v. Pullman Incorporated

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 14, 1984
102 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Satra Corporation v. Pullman Incorporated

Case Details

Full title:SATRA CORPORATION, Respondent, v. PULLMAN INCORPORATED, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1984

Citations

102 A.D.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Lee v. Ciaramella

In the absence of such a relationship, it is error to direct an accounting. See Charles Hyman, Inc. v. Olsen…