From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satcher v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 10, 2014
7:12-CV-3652-VEH-JHE (N.D. Ala. Jul. 10, 2014)

Summary

finding that grabbing an inmate's genitals and buttocks was not sufficient to violate the Eighth Amendment

Summary of this case from Major v. Toole

Opinion

7:12-CV-3652-VEH-JHE

07-10-2014

RAYDREKOUS SATCHER, Plaintiff, v. WILLIE THOMAS, et al, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on June 20, 2014, recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment sexual assault claim be granted and the action be dismissed with prejudice. No objections to the report and recommendation were filed by the parties.

On July 2, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss this case, which this Court construes as a motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff does not declare whether he desires a dismissal with or without prejudice. (Doc. 19). Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment and no "stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared in this case has been filed." See Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Fed. R. Civ. P. Under these circumstances, Plaintiff's case cannot be dismissed on his motion without a court order. However, Rule 41(a)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P. allows this Court to grant Plaintiff's motion "on terms the court deems proper."

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion the magistrate judge's report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. The Court EXPRESSLY FINDS Plaintiff's motion to dismiss and Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment excessive force claim are due to be GRANTED. Further, Plaintiff's claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered.

__________

VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Satcher v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 10, 2014
7:12-CV-3652-VEH-JHE (N.D. Ala. Jul. 10, 2014)

finding that grabbing an inmate's genitals and buttocks was not sufficient to violate the Eighth Amendment

Summary of this case from Major v. Toole
Case details for

Satcher v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:RAYDREKOUS SATCHER, Plaintiff, v. WILLIE THOMAS, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 10, 2014

Citations

7:12-CV-3652-VEH-JHE (N.D. Ala. Jul. 10, 2014)

Citing Cases

Owens v. Prince

Moreover, he complains primarily about a single, non-violent incident that in no way resembles "[c]ases where…

Major v. Toole

In the Eleventh Circuit, a one-time act of sexual touching does not violate the Eighth Amendment. See…