From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarwar v. Blackwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 30, 2001
285 A.D.2d 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted June 20, 2001.

July 30, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant James Blackwell, Jr., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated September 19, 2000, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against him on the issue of liability.

Jaffe Nohavicka, New York, N.Y. (Stacey R. Seldin of counsel), for appellant.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, P.J., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The plaintiff failed to demonstrate his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. There was conflicting evidence as to whether the plaintiff's vehicle was stopped when it was struck in the rear by the appellant's vehicle, and whether the appellant's vehicle was propelled into the plaintiff's vehicle by a third vehicle operated by the defendant Camille McLeod (see, Hudson v. Cole, 264 A.D.2d 439; Gerbino v. Hillel, 262 A.D.2d 528; cf., Cacace v. DiStefano, 276 A.D.2d 457). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in granting the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against the appellant on the issue of liability.

BRACKEN, P.J., FRIEDMANN, FLORIO, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sarwar v. Blackwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 30, 2001
285 A.D.2d 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Sarwar v. Blackwell

Case Details

Full title:MUHAMMAD SARWAR, respondent, v. JAMES BLACKWELL, JR., appellant, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 30, 2001

Citations

285 A.D.2d 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
728 N.Y.S.2d 400

Citing Cases

Conciatori v. Port Auth

A court may not weigh the credibility of witnesses on a motion for summary judgment,"unless it clearly…