From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sartori v. Steider & Assocs., P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 8, 2017
1:15-cv-00991-JCH-LF (D.N.M. Feb. 8, 2017)

Opinion

1:15-cv-00991-JCH-LF

02-08-2017

ROBERT F. SARTORI, Plaintiff, v. STEIDER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.,TIMOTHY D. STEIDER, SUNWEST TRUST, INC., TERRY WHITE, MOLLY BENCY, FRED HERMANN, TIM STEIDER, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF STEIDER & ASSOCIATES , P.C., TIMOTHY D. STEIDER, AND TIM STEIDER

The Magistrate Judge filed her Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 51) on plaintiff Robert F. Sartori's Motion to Strike the Affirmative Defenses of Steider & Associates, P.C., Timothy D. Steider, and Tim Steider (Doc. 29) on January 19, 2017. The proposed findings notified the parties of their ability to file objections within fourteen (14) days and that failure to do so waived appellate review. To date, the parties have not filed any objections and there is nothing in the record indicating that the proposed findings were not delivered.

Wherefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition on plaintiff Robert F. Sartori's Motion to Strike the Affirmative Defenses of Steider & Associates, P.C., Timothy D. Steider, and Tim Steider (Doc. 29) are ADOPTED;

2. The Court DENIES plaintiff Robert F. Sartori's Motion to Strike the Affirmative
Defenses of Steider & Associates, P.C., Timothy D. Steider, and Tim Steider (Doc. 29).

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sartori v. Steider & Assocs., P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 8, 2017
1:15-cv-00991-JCH-LF (D.N.M. Feb. 8, 2017)
Case details for

Sartori v. Steider & Assocs., P.C.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT F. SARTORI, Plaintiff, v. STEIDER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.,TIMOTHY D…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Feb 8, 2017

Citations

1:15-cv-00991-JCH-LF (D.N.M. Feb. 8, 2017)

Citing Cases

Young v. Npas, Inc.

(See ECF No. 82 at 11.) "While the Tenth Circuit has not ruled definitively that the FDCPA is a strict…

Strobel v. Rusch

"This District does not require factual specificity in affirmative defenses, and has declined to extend the…