From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sartin v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Nov 4, 2012
No. 5:12-cv-342 DPM-JTR (E.D. Ark. Nov. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. 5:12-cv-342 DPM-JTR

11-04-2012

ANTONIO DESHUN SARTIN, ADC #128441 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


ORDER

Sartin, incarcerated in the Arkansas Department of Correction, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in September 2012, but his application to proceed in forma pauperis was denied. Document No. 3. The Court explained that "[i]f [Sartin] wishes to continue with this habeas action, he must pay the $5.00 filing fee, in full, on or before October 15, 2012." Ibid. (emphasis original). He has failed to do so.

The Court warned Sartin his case could be dismissed if he failed to act within 30 days, citing Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Ibid. Sartin did not act, and more than 45 days have passed since Judge Ray's Order. Sartin's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Document No. 2, is therefore dismissed without prejudice.

So Ordered.

_______________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sartin v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Nov 4, 2012
No. 5:12-cv-342 DPM-JTR (E.D. Ark. Nov. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Sartin v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO DESHUN SARTIN, ADC #128441 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Nov 4, 2012

Citations

No. 5:12-cv-342 DPM-JTR (E.D. Ark. Nov. 4, 2012)