Sarmiento v. Rackley

Full title: SAMUEL SARMIENTO, Petitioner, v. RONALD RACKLEY, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 1, 2015

2:15-cv-0364 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2015)

Opinion

SAMUEL SARMIENTO, Petitioner, v. RONALD RACKLEY, Respondent. No. 2:15-cv-0364 KJM CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. July 1, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On May 20, 2015, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner file an opposition to respondent's pending motion to dismiss within thirty days or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.