From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarah Stackpole v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 2011
82 A.D.3d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 4586.

March 24, 2011.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered August 26, 2010, after a nonjury trial, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

William M. Pinzler, New York, for appellant.

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney Carpenter LLP, New York (John P. Cookson of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.


This legal malpractice action arises from defendant's representation of plaintiff in connection with her purchase of a cooperative apartment that she intended to use as a medical office. Plaintiff alleged that defendant was negligent in failing to advise her, before she closed on the purchase, that the certificate of occupancy did not permit the use of the apartment as a professional space, and that, as a result of this negligence, she was forced to expend large sums of money to amend the certificate of occupancy and make certain alterations.

The record supports the trial court's finding, based on credibility determinations, that plaintiff failed to prove that defendant did not advise her that her intended use of the apartment was impermissible under the certificate of occupancy ( see Garza v 508 W. 112th St., Inc., 71 AD3d 567). To the extent that defendant was negligent in failing to further advise plaintiff of the consequences of occupying a cooperative apartment in contravention of the certificate of occupancy, plaintiff failed to prove that, but for defendant's negligence, she would not have purchased the apartment. To the contrary, plaintiff testified that she had been made aware of the "horrors" (including the cost) of amending a certificate of occupancy several years before in connection with an apartment in another building; despite this awareness, she purchased the subject apartment ( see e.g. AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435-436; Orchard Motorcycle Distribs., Inc. v Morrison Cohen Singer Weinstein, LLP, 49 AD3d 292).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Sarah Stackpole v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 2011
82 A.D.3d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Sarah Stackpole v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:SARAH STACKPOLE, M.D., Appellant, v. COHEN, EHRLICH FRANKEL, LLP…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 24, 2011

Citations

82 A.D.3d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 2137
920 N.Y.S.2d 31