Opinion
Case No. 5D20-1104
07-21-2020
Juan Jose Sapeg, Sanford, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.
Juan Jose Sapeg, Sanford, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Jackman v. State, 88 So. 3d 325, 327 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (concluding that a trial court is without jurisdiction to consider the merits of a successive motion while a related appeal is pending but may "determine that the motion is procedurally barred and may dismiss the motion as successive or untimely").
EISNAUGLE, GROSSHANS, and TRAVER, JJ., concur.