From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santos v. Anderson

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 20, 1929
146 A. 916 (N.J. 1929)

Opinion

Submitted October 26, 1928 —

Decided May 20, 1929.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 6 N.J. Mis. R. 799.

On appeal of Morris Le Vor and Isadore Kaplan.

For the respondent, Irving Siegler.

For the appellants, Michael J. Bruder.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Santos v. Anderson

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 20, 1929
146 A. 916 (N.J. 1929)
Case details for

Santos v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:AMELIA SANTOS, EXECUTRIX, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ELIZABETH ANDERSON ET AL.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 20, 1929

Citations

146 A. 916 (N.J. 1929)
146 A. 916

Citing Cases

Vitale v. Hotel California, Inc.

Amercement may also be sought in similar contexts. N.J.S.A. 2A:15-22 (amercement of officer executing writ…

Beekwilder v. Beekwilder

And in connection with such an amercement, it has been held that the surety has no right to trial by jury.…