From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santoro v. United States

U.S.
Jun 10, 1968
392 U.S. 301 (1968)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

No. 1219.

Decided June 10, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 388 F.2d 113, vacated and remanded.

Robert S. Bailey for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.


The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Santoro v. United States

U.S.
Jun 10, 1968
392 U.S. 301 (1968)
Case details for

Santoro v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SANTORO v . UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 10, 1968

Citations

392 U.S. 301 (1968)

Citing Cases

United States v. Sims

It appears that several other Circuits are also in disagreement on this question. See e.g., Santoro v. United…

United States v. Sims

In at least four of these cases, we determined, from the lower court opinion, that the declarant (the maker…