From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santona-Nervia Corp. v. Publix Market

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 13, 1962
146 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

Opinion

No. 62-438.

November 13, 1962.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Harold R. Vann, J.

Anderson Nadeau, Miami, for appellant.

Kurtz, Reed, Sappenfield Cooper, Miami, for appellee.

Before CARROLL, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.


This is an interlocutory appeal by a plaintiff below, seeking review of an order granting temporary injunction in its favor conditioned upon the posting of a $50,000.00 bond.

The injunction was obtained by the appellant-plaintiff. It appears that it was entered upon evidence taken before the chancellor which is not included in the record. There was no showing permitting the issuance of a temporary injunction without bond, pursuant to the provisions of § 64.03 of the Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Therefore, the chancellor [having determined to issue the injunction] was required to fix the terms, conditions and amount of an injunction bond. The injunction stopped the completion of a supermarket in Coral Gables, Florida, and there does not appear to be any abuse of discretion by the chancellor in the fixing of a bond of $50,000.00.

Without the record of the proceedings before the chancellor being included in the record, this court is not authorized to reverse nor amend the ruling complained of. See: Hall v. Davis, Fla.App. 1958, 106 So.2d 599; Insana v. Hasty, Fla.App. 1959, 109 So.2d 791; Downing v. Bird, Fla.App. 1962, 145 So.2d 559.

For the above stated reasons, the order here under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Santona-Nervia Corp. v. Publix Market

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 13, 1962
146 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)
Case details for

Santona-Nervia Corp. v. Publix Market

Case Details

Full title:SANTONA-NERVIA CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIX…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 13, 1962

Citations

146 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

Citing Cases

Hoffman v. White

The injunction order under review failed to make findings or reflect essential facts to qualify it under the…

BERK v. BERK

Therefore, we have no alternative but to affirm the action of the trial judge here under review. Best v.…